{"id":306,"date":"2013-10-14T06:13:45","date_gmt":"2013-10-14T05:13:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/?p=306"},"modified":"2013-10-14T06:13:45","modified_gmt":"2013-10-14T05:13:45","slug":"who-were-the-physiocrats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/?p=306","title":{"rendered":"Who were the physiocrats?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\">IF YOU asked twenty well-educated souls to identify a physiocrat, only a couple could help you out. Writers like A.R.J. Turgot, the Marquis de Condorcet and Francois Quesnay are not household names, unlike Adam Smith or David Ricardo. But they are important. According to one late-19th&nbsp;century historian, the physiocrats (who called themselves the &#8220;\u00e9conomistes&#8221;)&nbsp;created &#8220;the first strictly scientific system of economics&#8221;.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Physiocracy was a theory of wealth. The physiocrats, led by Quesnay, believed that the wealth of nations was derived solely from the value of agriculture. Quesnay\u2019s understanding of value-added was rather primitive\u2014he could not see, for example, how manufacturing could create wealth. Farmers, on the other hand, could. As Karl Marx explains in &#8220;Das Kapital&#8221;, &#8220;the Physiocrats insist that only agricultural labour is productive, since that alone, they say, yields a surplus-value&#8221;.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">The physiocrats are most commonly known for these simplistic economic ideas. But this was not their most important contribution to economic thought. Rather, it was the physiocrats\u2019 methodological approach to economics that was revolutionary.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Before physiocracy, economics was not a very scientific discipline. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/freeexchange\/2013\/08\/economic-history\">As&#8230;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/freeexchange\/2013\/10\/economic-history-0?fsrc=rss\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n<p>via Johnson http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/freeexchange\/2013\/10\/economic-history-0?fsrc=rss<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>IF YOU asked twenty well-educated souls to identify a physiocrat, only a couple could help you out. Writers like A.R.J. Turgot, the Marquis de Condorcet and Francois Quesnay are not household names, unlike Adam Smith or David Ricardo. But they are important. According to one late-19th&nbsp;century historian, the physiocrats (who called themselves the &#8220;\u00e9conomistes&#8221;)&nbsp;created &#8220;the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13],"tags":[75],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=306"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jesusromerotrillo.es\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}